Polymers in Medicine

Polim. Med.
Index Copernicus (ICV 2022) – 121.55
MEiN – 70
Average rejection rate – 39.13%
ISSN 0370-0747 (print)
ISSN 2451-2699 (online) 
Periodicity – biannual

Download PDF

Polymers in Medicine

2017, vol. 47, nr 1, January-June, p. 55–59

doi: 10.17219/pim/76819

Publication type: review article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Synthetic grafts in the treatment of ruptured anterior cruciate ligament of the knee joint

Wojciech Satora1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Aleksandra Królikowska2,A,E,F, Andrzej Czamara2,A,E,F, Paweł Reichert3,A,E,F

1 Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, St. Luke’s Hospital, Bielsko-Biała, Poland

2 College of Physiotherapy in Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland

3 Division of Sports Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland

Abstract

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is cited as the most frequently injured ligament in the knee. The standard treatment of ACL injury remains ligament reconstruction followed by a postoperative physiotherapeutic procedure. During the reconstruction, the torn ligament can be replaced with an autograft or an allograft. A synthetic ligament is also one of the available graft options. Synthetic grafts in ruptured ACL treatment have been used as scaffolds, stents, or prostheses. The story of using synthetic materials in ACL deficient knee treatment started in the beginning of the 20th century with the usage of silk and silver fibers. The second half of the 20th century abounded in new synthetic materials being proposed as torn ACL replacements, such as Supramid®, Teflon® or Dacron®, Proplast®, carbon fiber graft, ABC graft, Kennedy-LAD®, Trevia, Leeds-Keio, Gore-Tex®, PDS®, EULIT®, and Polyflex® or LARS®. Artificial ligaments have intrigued surgeons for all these years as they represent the hope for grafts that are easily available and stronger than soft tissue “off-the-shelf” grafts, simplifying the surgery, and avoiding graft harvesting and donor site morbidity. However, most of the artificial grafts have been characterized by high rates of failure. One of the very few synthetic grafts gaining more widespread popularity has been LARS®. However, it is suggested that the ligament not be considered as a potential graft for primary reconstruction of the ACL, and it should be rather treated as an alternative graft in special cases, so the optimal synthetic graft material remains controversial.

Key words

artificial ligament, ligament prostheses, ligament reconstruction

References (50)

  1. Gianotti SM, et al. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: A national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(6):622–627.
  2. Janssen KW, et al. High incidence and costs for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions performed in Australia from 2003–2004 to 2007–2008: Time for an anterior cruciate ligament register by Scandinavian model? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;22(4):495–501.
  3. Prodromos CC, et al. A meta-analysis of the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears as a function of gender, sport, and a knee injury-reduction regimen. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(12):1320–1325.
  4. Ekstrand J. A 94% return to elite level football after ACL surgery: A proof of possibilities with optimal caretaking or a sign of knee abuse? Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol, Arthrosc. 2011;19(1):1–2.
  5. Arna Risberg M, Lewek M, Snyder-Mackler L. A systematic review of evidence for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation: how much and what type? Phys Ther Sport. 2004;5(3):125–145.
  6. George MS, Dunn WR, Spindler KP. Current concepts review: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(12):2026–2037.
  7. Chaudhari AM, et al. Knee kinematics, cartilage morphology, and osteoarthritis after ACL injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(2):215–222.
  8. Buller LT, et al. Trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3(1):23259671–14563664.
  9. Palmer I. On the injuries to the ligaments of the knee joint: A clinical study. Acta Chir Scand. 1938;91:282.
  10. Abbott LC, et al. Injuries to the ligaments of the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg. 1944;26(3):18.
  11. Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A. The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975(106):216–231.
  12. Norwood LA, Cross MJ. Anterior cruciate ligament: Functional anatomy of its bundles in rotatory instabilities. Am J Sports Med. 1979;7(1):23–26.
  13. Amis AA, Dawkins GP. Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(2):260–267.
  14. West RV, Harner CD. Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(3):197–207.
  15. Cohen SB, Sekiya JK. Allograft safety in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 2007;26(4):597–605.
  16. Zeng C, et al. Autograft versus allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and systematic review of overlapping systematic reviews. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(1):153–163.
  17. Samuelsson K, et al. Trends in surgeon preferences on anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive techniques. Clin Sports Med. 2013;32(1):111–126.
  18. Barrera Oro F, et al. Autograft versus allograft: An economic cost comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(9):1219–1225.
  19. Cooper MT, Kaeding C. Comparison of the hospital cost of autograft versus allograft soft–tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(11):1478–1482.
  20. Johnson D. Why synthetic grafts failed, in the anterior cruciate ligament: Reconstruction and basic science. C. Prodromos, C., Editor. 2008, Saunders Elsevier: Philadelphia, 88–90.
  21. Smith A. The diagnosis and treatment of injuries to the crucial ligaments. Br J Surg. 1918;6:176–189.
  22. Herz M. Die chirurgische Behandlung paralytischer Schlotterelenke-Seitenligamente oder Arthrodese? [The surgical treatment of paralytic flail knees: Silk ligaments or arthrodesis]. Munch Med Wschr. 1906;51:2527–2529.
  23. Schindler OS. Surgery for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: A historical perspective. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(1):5–47.
  24. Zoltan DJ, Reinecke C, Indelicato PA. Synthetic and allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 1988;7(4):773–784.
  25. Lange F. Uber the Sehnenplastik [On the tendon reconstruction]. Verh Dtsch Orthop Ges. 1903;2:10–12.
  26. Lange F. Kunstliche Gelenkbander aus Seide [On artificial silk ligaments]. Munch Med Wschr. 1907;52:834–836.
  27. Lange M. Unfallorthopadie. 1949, Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.
  28. Ludloff K. Der operative Ersatz des vorderen Kreuzbandes am Knie [Surgical replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament]. Zentralbl Chir. 1927;54:3162–3166.
  29. Corner EM. The exploration of the knee-joint: With some illustrative cases. Br J Surg. 1914;2(6):191–204.
  30. Ruther H. Die Verwendung von Supramid in der operativen Orthopadie. Z Orthop. 1949;78:161–169.
  31. Emery MA, Rostrup O. Repair of the anterior cruciate ligament with 8 mm, tube teflon in dogs. Can J Surg. 1960;4:111–115.
  32. Rostrup O. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligaments. West J Surg Obstet Gynecol. 1964;72:199–202.
  33. Wilk RM, Richmond JC. Dacron ligament reconstruction for chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(3):374–379.
  34. Maletius W, Gillquist J. Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a Dacron prosthesis. The frequency of osteoarthritis after seven to eleven years. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25(3):288–293.
  35. Woods GW, et al. Proplast leader for use in cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1979;7(6):314–320.
  36. Jenkins DH. The repair of cruciate ligaments with flexible carbon fibre. A longer term study of the induction of new ligaments and of the fate of the implanted carbon. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978;60-b(4):520–522.
  37. Strover AE, Firer P. The use of carbon fiber implants in anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985(196):88–98.
  38. Górecki A. Przydatność włókien węglowych w śródstawowych rekonstrukcjach przedniego więzadła krzyżowego stawu kolanowego. 1983, Rozprawa doktorska, Akademia Medyczna w Warszawie.
  39. Kuś W. Badania doświadczalne nad zastosowaniem włókien węglowych w operacjach odtwórczych narządu ruchu. 1986, Rozprawa habilitacyjna, Akademia Medyczna w Warszawie.
  40. Kennedy J, Willis R. Synthetic cruciate ligaments: Preliminary report. J Bone Jt Surg. 1976;58(B):142.
  41. Drogset JO, et al. A sixteen-year follow-up of three operative techniques for the treatment of acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(5):944–952.
  42. Murray AW, Macnicol MF. 10–16 year results of Leeds-Keio anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The Knee. 2004;11(1):9–14.
  43. Riel KA. Augmented anterior cruciate ligament replacement with the Kennedy-LAD (ligament augmentation device) – long term outcome. Zentralbl Chir. 1998;123(9):1014–1018.
  44. Kumar K, Maffulli N. The ligament augmentation device: A historical perspective. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(4):422–432.
  45. Jia ZY, et al. Comparison of artificial graft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):309.
  46. James SL, et al. Cruciate ligament stents in reconstruction of the unstable knee. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979(143):90–96.
  47. Dericks G. Ligament advanced reinforcement system anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine. 1995;3(3):187–205.
  48. Krupa S, Krolikowska A, Reichert P. Postoperative knee joint stability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the ligament advanced reinforcement system. Polim Med. 2016;46(2):155–161.
  49. Parchi PD, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LARS artificial ligament results at a mean follow-up of eight years. Int Orthop. 2013;37(8):1567–1574.
  50. Tiefenboeck TM, et al. Clinical and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the LARS system at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Knee. 2015;22(6):565–568.
© Wroclaw Medical University