Polymers in Medicine

Polim. Med.
Scopus CiteScore: 3.5 (CiteScore Tracker 4.1)
Index Copernicus (ICV 2024) – 125.42
MEiN – 70
ISSN 0370-0747 (print)
ISSN 2451-2699 (online) 
Periodicity – biannual

Download original text (EN)

Polymers in Medicine

Ahead of print

doi: 10.17219/pim/208132

Publication type: review

Language: English

License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Cite as:


Popiel-Kopaczyk A, Kręcicki TS, Kozieł R. Photodynamic therapy: Basics and new directions for clinical applications [published online as ahead of print on October 8, 2025]. Polim Med. 2025. doi:10.17219/pim/208132

Photodynamic therapy: Basics and new directions for clinical applications

Aneta Popiel-Kopaczyk1,A,B,E,F, Tomasz Stanisław Kręcicki2,B,D, Roksana Kozieł3,C

1 Division of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland

2 Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland

3 Institute of Internal Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland

Graphical abstract


Graphical abstracts

Highlights


• Photodynamic therapy (PDT) provides targeted, minimally invasive cancer treatment, achieving tumor control while sparing surrounding healthy tissues.
• Applications of PDT extend beyond oncology, with growing evidence supporting its use in dermatology, ophthalmology and neurodegenerative disorders.
• Next-generation photosensitizers and nanocarriers improve PDT efficacy, enabling deeper light penetration and advancing its role in precision medicine.
• PDT reshapes the tumor microenvironment and enhances immune response, increasing effectiveness when combined with immunotherapies and other treatment modalities.

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) remains a developing modality in cancer treatment. It is a minimally invasive approach that employs a photosensitizing drug, activated by light, to induce localized cytotoxic effects. Initially introduced in oncology, PDT has proven effective for cancers such as skin malignancies and head and neck tumors, while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. Beyond oncology, its use has expanded to dermatology, ophthalmology and dentistry, and it shows promise in the management of chronic inflammatory conditions, pediatric nephrology and emerging applications in cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Despite persistent challenges such as limited light penetration, advances in photosensitizers and integration with technologies including immunotherapy and polymeric nanocarriers underscore PDT’s potential as a versatile tool in precision medicine. Recent studies suggest that PDT can also modulate the tumor microenvironment (TME) and stimulate anti-tumor immune responses, thereby enhancing its therapeutic impact. Consequently, it is increasingly being investigated in combination with other treatment modalities to overcome resistance and improve patient outcomes.

Key words: photodynamic therapy, polymers, photosensitizing effect

Introduction

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a contemporary, localized approach for treating tumors and precancerous conditions. The technique selectively targets diseased tissues while sparing adjacent healthy structures, often resulting in superior cosmetic outcomes compared with conventional therapies. It involves administering a photosensitizer that preferentially accumulates in tumor cells; upon activation by light, it triggers cytotoxic reactions that lead to cell death. A major advantage of PDT is its selectivity: photosensitizers accumulate preferentially in tumor cells, thereby increasing safety for patients.1, 2 In clinical practice, PDT is primarily employed in dermatology,3 urology,4 ophthalmology,5 and gynecology,6 for both oncological and non-oncological conditions. Its applications in cardiology, neurosurgery and orthopedics are less frequent. It is also used in the management of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and other ocular diseases.7 Research into its potential for treating coronary diseases, leukemias and transplant rejection prevention is ongoing. The forgotten approach of PDT, i.e., photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT), has been intensively developed in recent years.8 Similarly to PDT, PACT involves phototoxic reactions activated by visible or ultraviolet light, activating photosensitizers, primarily porphyrin-based. It is often recently used to neutralize viruses, drug-resistant bacteria, yeasts, and parasites. Moreover, PACT is successfully applied in dentistry, e.g., in treating caries and gingivitis, as well as for plaque removal. Thus, PDT procedures find a broad application in various neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases, with relatively good patient comfort.

In recent years, the versatility and precision of PDT have attracted growing interest in the context of personalized medicine. Ongoing research explores the combination of PDT with nanotechnology and immunotherapy, enhancing both its specificity and therapeutic efficacy. Moreover, new generations of photosensitizers are being developed to optimize light absorption, improve tumor selectivity and reduce systemic toxicity. These advances could help overcome current limitations, such as poor light penetration into deep tissues. As such, PDT continues to evolve as a promising, multi-faceted modality in modern clinical practice, with the potential to reshape treatment paradigms across diverse medical disciplines.

Photosensitizers

Photosensitizers are dyes that initiate physicochemical reactions when exposed to light of a specific wavelength. In PDT, the radiation used falls within the visible spectrum (400–700 nm). Tissue penetration depends on both wavelength and energy, increasing with longer wavelengths at a constant intensity. Blue and green light, with shorter wavelengths, penetrate up to approx. 2 mm, whereas red light (>600 nm) can reach depths beyond 3.5 mm.9, 10 However, light energy decreases substantially in deeper tissue layers, limiting the photodynamic effect. For this reason, photosensitizers that absorb light at longer wavelengths are preferred to improve penetration into deeper structures. Most currently available photosensitizers absorb at approx. 630–650 nm, a range often referred to as the “therapeutic window.” Natural pigments such as hemoglobin also absorb light and thereby restrict penetration. To be effective, an ideal photosensitizer must satisfy several criteria9, 11, 12:

• Retention in tissue for at least several hours;

• An absorption spectrum distinct from naturally occurring pigments in the body;

• Minimal side effects;

• High efficiency in generating singlet oxygen or radical oxygen species.

Hematoporphyrin derivatives (HpDs) are the most widely used first-generation photosensitizers and only partially fulfill the criteria for an ideal agent. Hematoporphyrin, first described by Lipson et al. in 1961, was the earliest photosensitizer applied in PDT and later received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. When administered intravenously at a dose of 2 mg/kg body weight, HpD accumulates in tumor tissue within 48–72 h but persists in the body for 6–8 weeks, leading to prolonged photosensitivity. Hematoporphyrin derivatives are activated by red light at 630 ±3 nm.13 The purified form of this compound was commercialized as Photofrin and has been widely used in clinical practice (https://photofrin.com/).13 Other groups of photosensitizing agents include cyanines and phthalocyanines,14, 15 chlorins16 and bacteriochlorins, as well as naturally derived compounds such as curcumin, hypericin and riboflavin.9

Procedure and basic mechanisms of PDT

Photodynamic therapy involves several stages: photosensitizer administration, cellular accumulation, irradiation, induction of cytotoxic reactions, and subsequent wound formation. The first step is administration, during which the patient receives a photosensitizer that penetrates tumor cells. Over the next several hours, the photosensitizer accumulates selectively within tumor cells, preparing the tissue for light activation. The tumor site is then irradiated with light at a wavelength corresponding to the absorption spectrum of the photosensitizer, typically applied for about 10 min per site. This irradiation triggers cytotoxic reactions in which reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals are generated within tumor cells. The treatment is followed by localized wound formation and subsequent healing, with the affected area typically resolving over several weeks and leaving minimal scarring.2

Photodynamic reactions can proceed through distinct mechanisms, and 3 principal pathways of PDT-induced effects on tumor tissue have been described. In the Type I mechanism, photosensitizers react with acceptor molecules to generate radical species. In the Type II mechanism, triplet-state photosensitizers interact directly with molecular oxygen, producing singlet oxygen.17 The Type III mechanism is associated with stimulation of the immune response against cancer cells.18 Following PDT, tumor cells may undergo cell death – through apoptosis, necrosis or other regulated pathways – triggered by photodamage to intracellular compartments such as mitochondria, lyso­somes or the endoplasmic reticulum.19

Clinical applications of PDT

Photodynamic therapy has evolved into a versatile treatment modality with applications extending well beyond its original focus on oncology. Its expanding clinical utility – from inflammatory conditions to pediatric nephrology – offers an increasingly attractive area of investigation for both clinicians and researchers. Recent advances in PDT have focused on improving photosensitizer delivery and combining the technique with chemotherapeutics, anti­bodies or other adjuvant agents.6, 20 Importantly, PDT can be applied in 2 main directions: the treatment of oncological and non-oncological diseases.

Oncological applications

Photodynamic therapy is well established in the treatment of a variety of cancers, including skin malignancies (e.g., basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and actinic keratosis), as well as head and neck cancers, esophageal cancer, bladder cancer, and lung cancer.13, 17 In oncological protocols, PDT primarily employs broad-spectrum red light, with typical therapeutic doses ranging within 100–150 J/cm2 at an intensity of 100–200 mW/cm2.19 The mechanisms of PDT involve the selective accumulation of photosensitizers in malignant tissues, followed by light activation that triggers cytotoxic reactions leading to cell death, vascular damage and local inflammation, while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. This selectivity not only reduces treatment-related morbidity but also improves cosmetic outcomes, reinforcing confidence in PDT’s clinical efficacy.19 Selectivity can be further enhanced through the use of nanocarriers to optimize photosensitizer delivery or by conjugating photosensitizers with antibodies that target specific cell populations.17, 18

Non-oncological dermatological and inflammatory conditions

In dermatology, PDT has been employed to manage21, 22:

• Psoriasis: PDT modulates immune responses and reduces keratinocyte proliferation.23

• Acne vulgaris: PDT with 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) or methyl aminolevulinate targets sebaceous glands and reduces Cutibacterium acnes load.24

• Vitiligo: PDT procedure promotes melanocyte regeneration through photomodulation.25

• Chronic ulcers: photodynamic therapy enhances wound healing by reducing microbial load and stimulating angiogenesis.

• Recurrent palmar and plantar warts caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection.26

It is also used in several non-oncological disorders, with lower PDT doses in the range of 10–40 J/cm2 and intensity of 50–70 mW/cm2.21 Similar PDT doses have shown promise in treating inflammatory diseases due to their ability to reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines and modulate immune responses.27 This procedure can be effectively used in:

• Rheumatoid arthritis: Experimental studies suggest that PDT can reduce joint inflammation and synovial hyperplasia.

• Periodontitis and gingivitis, where this method is applied in dental settings: PDT targets biofilms and resistant bacteria, improving oral health outcomes.

• Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): Early-stage research indicates its potential in managing localized intestinal inflammation.

Applications in pediatric diseases

In pediatrics, PDT is emerging as a potential therapeutic approach to address conditions involving inflammation, infections or dental disorders28:

• Nephrology and urinary tract infections (UTIs): PDT can serve as an adjunct to antibiotics, targeting multidrug-resistant bacterial strains and reducing recurrent infections in children.29, 30

• Renal fibrosis: Studies indicate that PDT may inhibit fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition, which are central to chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. The potential of PDT in managing CKD offers a ray of hope for future therapeutic approaches.30

• Dentistry: PDT’s immunomodulatory effects could potentially attenuate systemic inflammation associated with glomerular diseases.31

Ophthalmological disorders

Photodynamic therapy, as a highly precise technique, has also found important applications in ophthalmology, where it is commonly employed for5, 7:

• Age-related macular degeneration: PDT slows the progression of neovascularization and is primarily indicated for the wet form of the disease, which is characterized by abnormal blood vessel growth and may lead to vision loss.

• Non-AMD choroidal neovascularization: PDT is also used to manage neovascularization unrelated to AMD.

• Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR): PDT reduces retinal detachment and fluid accumulation.

• Choroidal hemangioma: PDT with verteporfin has been applied as a targeted treatment option.

• Diabetic retinopathy: PDT minimizes angiogenesis and preserves visual acuity.

Photodynamic therapy is widely used in ophthalmology, most commonly with verteporfin as the photosensitizer. It selectively targets choroidal vascular abnormalities, inducing occlusion of affected vessels. Initially, it was extensively applied at full-dose verteporfin for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). However, when vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibitors were detected, the clinical approach has shifted toward other chorioretinal disorders, including central serous chorioretinopathy, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and choroidal hemangioma.32

Emerging applications in cardiovascular and neurological diseases

Research on PDT is also expanding into novel fields. In atherosclerosis, photodynamic activation of porphyrins has been investigated for targeting atherosclerotic plaques and improving vascular health.33, 34 In neurodegenerative diseases, PDT-mediated clearance of amyloid plaques is being explored as a potential therapeutic approach for Alzheimer’s disease.35

It was noted that cardiovascular disorders are among the leading causes of death worldwide. Photodynamic therapy can be used to treat atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACD), and the photosensitizing agent should have a specific affinity for macrophages, which are crucial in the development of atherosclerosis.33 Available studies indicate that PDT using indocyanine green (ICG) is a promising approach for the prevention of restenosis36 and the treatment of atherosclerosis.37

Photodynamic therapy has also shown potential in the field of neurodegenerative diseases. Studies have demonstrated that nano-photosensitizers, such as core–shell azobenzene–spiropyran structures on gold nanoparticles, can inhibit tau protein aggregation in neural cells and promote dendritic growth in neuronal cells.38

Advantages of PDT in multisystem diseases

The localized action of PDT, which spares surrounding healthy tissues and produces minimal systemic effects, makes it particularly suitable for delicate pediatric populations and chronic inflammatory conditions. Furthermore, its adaptability to different photosensitizers and light sources broadens its potential for application across diverse pathologies. Table 121, 22, 23, 24, 30, 32, 34, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 provides a structured overview of PDT applications and their clinical relevance. Porfimer sodium, a first-generation photosensitizer, is extensively used in oncology. In contrast, ALA and methyl aminolevulinate (MAL), both second-generation photosensitizers, are more commonly applied in dermatology.39 Verteporfin is predominantly used in ophthalmology for conditions such as AMD.5 Additionally, emerging applications in inflammatory and pediatric conditions remain under experimental investigation, with ongoing efforts focused on developing optimized photosensitizers.

Photodynamic procedures with polymeric nanocarriers

Recently, PDT protocols have preferably used encapsulated photosensitizers to target cancer cells more precisely.47 One of the most applied types is polymeric nanocarriers,48 such as PEGylated micelles (PEG – polyethylene glycol micelles), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) or chitosan nanoparticles, dendrimers, and stimuli-responsive polymerosomes, which are increasingly explored to overcome the pharmacokinetic and selectivity barriers that still limit classical PDT.49 When we encapsulate hydrophobic photosensitizers, these biodegradable carriers protect them from early degradation, prolong systemic circulation, and favor passive accumulation within cancer tissue by the enhanced-permeation-and-retention effect, and simultaneously enhancing photo-dependent cytotoxicity. Available studies highlight additional advantages when nanocarrier surfaces are functionalized with antibodies, peptides or small-molecule ligands that actively direct the photosensitizer toward overexpressed cancer biomarkers.50 At the same time, pH-, redox- or light-cleavable polymer shells allow on-demand release precisely at the tumor target site. Beyond effective drug transport, polymeric platforms provide space to co-load oxygen carriers, immune adjuvants or chemotherapeutics, creating multifunctional “all-in-one” nanoreactors that synergize PDT with diagnostics, immuno- or chemotherapy.51, 52 Early pre-clinical studies already report superior tumor regression and reduced skin phototoxicity compared with free photosensitizers, underlining the clinical promise of polymer-based nanotechnology in both oncological and inflammatory indications.

Limitations

Despite its wide-ranging clinical potential, PDT is limited by shallow light penetration, lack of standardized treatment protocols and the prolonged photosensitivity caused by some photosensitizers. Additionally, many of its emerging applications remain experimental and require further clinical validation to confirm their safety
and efficacy.

Conclusions

Photodynamic therapy has evolved into a highly versatile and innovative treatment modality, extending beyond its oncological origins. This technique utilizes the selective activation of photosensitizers through light exposure to induce cytotoxic effects, exhibiting significant efficacy in targeting malignancies while preserving adjacent healthy tissue. Over time, the selectivity and minimally invasive characteristics of PDT have established it as a valuable asset in various clinical fields.

Initially a foundational approach in the management of conditions such as skin cancers, head and neck tumors and internal organ malignancies, PDT has broadened its applications to include dermatological conditions, such as acne and psoriasis, as well as ophthalmological disorders, particularly AMD and diabetic retinopathy. Additionally, its immunomodulatory properties facilitate the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, periodontitis and IBD. There is emerging potential for PDT in pediatric nephrology, addressing UTIs, alleviating inflammation in nephrotic syndrome and mitigating renal fibrosis.

Recent research also highlights the promise of PDT in treating cardiovascular diseases, particularly atherosclerosis, and neurodegenerative conditions, including Alzheimer’s disease, thereby expanding its clinical applications. The localized application of PDT minimizes collateral damage to healthy tissues, enhancing its value in sensitive areas such as the eyes or specific areas in pediatric disorders. Its low systemic toxicity ensures patient safety, while its adaptability allows for integration across diverse medical disciplines ranging from oncology to dentistry.

However, PDT is not without challenges. Limited light penetration restricts its efficacy to surface or near-surface lesions, necessitating the development of advanced photosensitizers with improved selectivity and deeper tissue penetration. Additionally, standardized treatment protocols are required to optimize outcomes across a wide range of diseases. Future research should prioritize next-generation photosensitizers and explore combinations with other therapies, such as immunotherapy or nanotechnology, to overcome current limitations and extend
PDT’s potential.

In conclusion, PDT represents a cutting-edge, minimally invasive treatment that connects traditional methods and modern precision medicine. Its success in oncology and other fields has paved the way for diverse applications, including inflammation management and pediatric nephrology, underscoring its multidisciplinary potential. With advancements in photosensitizer technology and light delivery systems, PDT is poised to play an increasingly significant role in medical practice. By addressing its current challenges and fostering interdisciplinary collaborations, PDT holds the promise of unlocking new therapeutic possibilities and improving patient outcomes across a wide spectrum of diseases.

Use of AI and AI-assisted technologies

Not applicable.

Tables


Table 1. Diseases treated with photodynamic therapy (PDT) and commonly used photosensitizers

Disease/condition

Clinical application

Photosensitizers

Light wavelength

Reference

Oncological applications

Skin cancers (BCC, SCC)

treatment of localized tumors with excellent cosmetic outcomes

Photofrin, Metvixia (MAL), ALA

630–650 nm (red light)

21, 22, 39

Head and neck cancers

ablation of tumors in hard-to-reach areas

Photofrin

630 nm

40

Esophageal cancer

localized destruction of malignant tissues

Photofrin

630 nm

41

Lung cancer

treatment of early-stage or non-resectable tumors

Photofrin

630 nm

42, 43

Non-oncological applications

Psoriasis

modulation of immune response and keratinocyte proliferation

MAL, ALA

630–650 nm

23

Acne vulgaris

targeting sebaceous glands and Cutibacterium acnes

ALA

400–450 nm (blue light)

24

Age-related macular degeneration

neovascularization inhibition

Verteporfin

689 nm (infrared)

34

Central serous chorioretinopathy

fluid accumulation reduction

Verteporfin

689 nm (infrared)

32

Periodontitis and gingivitis

bacterial biofilm reduction in dental applications

Toluidine blue, Methylene blue

630–700 nm

44

Inflammatory conditions

Rheumatoid arthritis

reducing joint inflammation

photosensitizers under development

experimental range

45

IBD

reducing localized intestinal inflammation

photosensitizers under development

experimental range

46

Pediatric nephrology

Urinary tract infection

targeting multidrug-resistant bacteria

photosensitizers under development

experimental range

47

Renal fibrosis

mitigation of fibroblast proliferation

photosensitizers under development

experimental range

30

UTIs – urinary tract infections; IBD – inflammatory bowel disease; BCC – basal cell carcinoma; SCC – squamous cell carcinoma;
MAL – methyl aminolevulinate; ALA – aminolevulinic acid.

References (52)

  1. Castano AP, Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy. Part one: Photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2004;1(4):279–293. doi:10.1016/S1572-1000(05)00007-4
  2. Kwiatkowski S, Knap B, Przystupski D, et al. Photodynamic therapy: Mechanisms, photosensitizers and combinations. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;106:1098–1107. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.049
  3. Zwiebel S, Baron E. PDT in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2011;146(6):431–444. PMID:22095175.
  4. Pinthus JH, Bogaards A, Weersink R, Wilson BC, Trachtenberg J. Photodynamic therapy for urological malignancies: Past to current approaches. J Urol. 2006;175(4):1201–1207. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)00701-9
  5. Raizada K, Naik M. Photodynamic therapy for the eye. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, USA: StatPearls Publishing; 2025:Bookshelf ID: NBK560686. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560686/. Accessed July 17, 2025.
  6. Allison RR, Cuenca R, Downie GH, Randall ME, Bagnato VS, Sibata CH. PD/PDT for gynecological disease: A clinical review. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2005;2(1):51–63. doi:10.1016/S1572-1000(05)00033-5
  7. Wormald R, Evans J, Smeeth L, Henshaw K. Photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(4):CD002030. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002030.pub2
  8. Hampden-Martin A, Fothergill J, El Mohtadi M, et al. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy coupled with the use of the photosensitizers methylene blue and temoporfin as a potential novel treatment for Staphylococcus aureus in burn infections. Access Microbiol. 2021;3(10):000273. doi:10.1099/acmi.0.000273
  9. Abrahamse H, Hamblin MR. New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Biochem J. 2016;473(4):347–364. doi:10.1042/bj20150942
  10. Vázquez-Hernández F, Granada-Ramírez DA, Arias-Cerón JS, et al. Use of nanostructured materials in drug delivery. In: Narayan R, ed. Nanobiomaterials. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2018:503–549. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100716-7.00020-9
  11. Dougherty TJ, Gomer CJ, Henderson BW, et al. Photodynamic therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(12):889–905. doi:10.1093/jnci/90.12.889
  12. Agostinis P, Berg K, Cengel KA, et al. Photodynamic therapy of cancer: An update. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(4):250–281. doi:10.3322/caac.20114
  13. Sun H, Yang W, Ong Y, Busch TM, Zhu TC. Fractionated photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy significantly improves long-term survival. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(23):5682. doi:10.3390/cancers15235682
  14. Kassab K. Photophysical and photosensitizing properties of selected cyanines. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2002;68(1):15–22. doi:10.1016/s1011-1344(02)00325-1
  15. Lange N, Szlasa W, Saczko J, Chwiłkowska A. Potential of cyanine derived dyes in photodynamic therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(6):818. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13060818
  16. Allison RR, Downie GH, Cuenca R, Hu XH, Childs CJ, Sibata CH. Photosensitizers in clinical PDT. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2004;1(1):27–42. doi:10.1016/s1572-1000(04)00007-9
  17. Zhao W, Wang L, Zhang M, et al. Photodynamic therapy for cancer: Mechanisms, photosensitizers, nanocarriers, and clinical studies. MedComm (2020). 2024;5(7):e603. doi:10.1002/mco2.603
  18. Wang X, Luo D, Basilion JP. Photodynamic therapy: Targeting cancer biomarkers for the treatment of cancers. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(12):2992. doi:10.3390/cancers13122992
  19. Mali SB, Dahivelkar S. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Oral Oncol Rep. 2024;9:100129. doi:10.1016/j.oor.2023.100129
  20. Choromańska A, Kulbacka J, Saczko J. Terapia fotodynamiczna –założenia, mechanizm, aplikacje kliniczne. Nowa Medycyna. 2013;1:26–30. https://www.nowamedycyna.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/nm_2013_026-030.pdf.
  21. Darlenski R, Fluhr JW. Photodynamic therapy in dermatology: Past, present, and future. J Biomed Opt. 2012;18(6):061208. doi:10.1117/1.jbo.18.6.061208
  22. Mitra A, Stables GI. Topical photodynamic therapy for non-cancerous skin conditions. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2006;3(2):116–127. doi:10.1016/S1572-1000(06)00035-4
  23. Makuch S, Dróżdż M, Makarec A, Ziółkowski P, Woźniak M. An update on photodynamic therapy of psoriasis: Current strategies and nanotechnology as a future perspective. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(17):9845. doi:10.3390/ijms23179845
  24. Taylor MN, Gonzalez ML. The practicalities of photodynamic therapy in acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160(6):1140–1148. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09054.x
  25. Rahimi H, Zeinali R, Tehranchinia Z. Photodynamic therapy of vitiligo: A pilot study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021;36:102439. doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102439
  26. Shen S, Feng J, Song X, Xiang W. Efficacy of photodynamic therapy for warts induced by human papilloma virus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022;39:102913. doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102913
  27. Ratkay LG, Waterfield JD, Hunt DWC. Photodynamic therapy in immune (non-oncological) disorders: Focus on benzoporphyrin derivatives. BioDrugs. 2000;14(2):127–135. doi:10.2165/00063030-200014020-00006
  28. Mazur A, Koziorowska K, Dynarowicz K, Aebisher D, Bartusik-Aebisher D. Photodynamic therapy for treatment of disease in children: A review of the literature. Children (Basel). 2022;9(5):695. doi:10.3390/children9050695
  29. Kunisue T, Chen Z, Buck Louis GM, et al. Urinary concentrations of benzophenone-type UV filters in U.S. women and their association with endometriosis. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(8):4624–4632. doi:10.1021/es204415a
  30. Matin SF, Tinkey PT, Borne AT, Stephens LC, Sherz A, Swanson DA. A pilot trial of vascular targeted photodynamic therapy for renal tissue. J Urol. 2008;180(1):338–342. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.02.042
  31. Silva T, Lunardi A, Barros A, et al. Application of photodynamic therapy in pediatric dentistry: Literature review. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(9):2335. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15092335
  32. Van Dijk EHC, Van Rijssen TJ, Subhi Y, Boon CJF. Photodynamic therapy for chorioretinal diseases: A practical approach. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020;9(2):329–342. doi:10.1007/s40123-020-00250-0
  33. Oskroba A, Bartusik-Aebisher D, Myśliwiec A, et al. Photodynamic therapy and cardiovascular diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(5):2974. doi:10.3390/ijms25052974
  34. Wańczura P, Aebisher D, Kłosowicz M, Myśliwiec A, Dynarowicz K, Bartusik-Aebisher D. Application of photodynamic therapy in cardiology. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(6):3206. doi:10.3390/ijms25063206
  35. Ding L, Gu Z, Chen H, et al. Phototherapy for age-related brain diseases: Challenges, successes and future. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;94:102183. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102183
  36. Lin JS, Wang CJ, Li WT. Photodynamic therapy of balloon-injured rat carotid arteries using indocyanine green. Lasers Med Sci. 2018;33(5):1123–1130. doi:10.1007/s10103-018-2488-7
  37. Houthoofd S, Vuylsteke M, Mordon S, Fourneau I. Photodynamic therapy for atherosclerosis: The potential of indocyanine green. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020;29:101568. doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.10.003
  38. Hau‐Ting Wei J, Cai‐Syaun Wu M, Chiang C, et al. Enhanced photodynamic therapy for neurodegenerative diseases: Development of Azobenzene‐Spiropyran@Gold Nanoparticles for controlled singlet oxygen generation. Chemistry. 2024;30(62):e202402479. doi:10.1002/chem.202402479
  39. Tarstedt M, Gillstedt M, Wennberg Larkö AM, Paoli J. Aminolevulinic acid and methyl aminolevulinate equally effective in topical photodynamic therapy for non‐melanoma skin cancers. Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(3):420–423. doi:10.1111/jdv.13558
  40. Biel MA. Photodynamic therapy of head and neck cancers. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;635:281–293. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-697-9_18
  41. Inoue T, Ishihara R. Photodynamic therapy for esophageal cancer. Clin Endosc. 2021;54(4):494–498. doi:10.5946/ce.2020.073
  42. Saczko J, Kulbacka J, Chwiłkowska A, Lugowski M, Banaś T. Levels of lipid peroxidation in A549 cells after PDT in vitro. Rocz Akad Med Bialymst. 2004;49(Suppl 1):82–84. PMID:15638383.
  43. Shafirstein G, Battoo A, Harris K, et al. Photodynamic therapy of non-small cell lung cancer: Narrative review and future directions. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(2):265–275. doi:10.1513/annalsats.201509-650fr
  44. Gallardo-Villagrán M, Leger DY, Liagre B, Therrien B. Photosensitizers used in the photodynamic therapy of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(13):3339. doi:10.3390/ijms20133339
  45. Deng B, Wang K, Zhang L, Qiu Z, Dong W, Wang W. Photodynamic therapy for inflammatory and cancerous diseases of the intestines: Molecular mechanisms and prospects for application. Int J Biol Sci. 2023;19(15):4793–4810. doi:10.7150/ijbs.87492
  46. Huang YY, Wintner A, Seed PC, Brauns T, Gelfand JA, Hamblin MR. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy mediated by methylene blue and potassium iodide to treat urinary tract infection in a female rat model. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7257. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25365-0
  47. Li L, Huh KM. Polymeric nanocarrier systems for photodynamic therapy. Biomater Res. 2014;18:19. doi:10.1186/2055-7124-18-19
  48. Kulbacka J, Choromańska A, Łapińska Z, Saczko J. Natural polymers in photodynamic therapy and diagnosis. Polim Med. 2021;51(1):33–41. doi:10.17219/pim/139587
  49. Bazylińska U, Kulbacka J, Chodaczek G. Nanoemulsion structural design in co-encapsulation of hybrid multifunctional agents: Influence of the smart PLGA polymers on the nanosystem-enhanced delivery and electro-photodynamic treatment. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(8):405. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics11080405
  50. Bajracharya R, Song JG, Patil BR, et al. Functional ligands for improving anticancer drug therapy: Current status and applications to drug delivery systems. Drug Deliv. 2022;29(1):1959–1970. doi:10.1080/10717544.2022.2089296
  51. Wang X, Li C, Wang Y, et al. Smart drug delivery systems for precise cancer therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12(11):4098–4121. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2022.08.013
  52. Chu S, Shi X, Tian Y, Gao F. pH-responsive polymer nanomaterials for tumor therapy. Front Oncol. 2022;12:855019. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.855019